(Back to Homepage)

ANALYSIS OF THE OCT. 6 SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCEMENT

How the pro-family movement helped spread “gay marriage” across America

POSTED: October 10, 2014      http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/14d/supreme-court-reaction/index.html

 

The incompetence of the pro-family legal side   [… EXCERPTS …]

It’s especially frustrating to know that there are so many excellent and unassailable (albeit not “politically correct”) arguments and facts about homosexual behavior that were never used.

 

The pro-family lawyers refused to consider using the vast storehouse of:

 

·        medical dangers,

·        diseases, 

·        psychological problems,

·        addictions,

·        domestic violence rates,

·        multiple partners,

·        “gay pride” perversions,

·        or suicidal behavior, etc. associated with homosexuality, as counter-arguments. They wouldn’t bring up:

·        natural law or morality.

·        They certainly would not talk about the emotional trauma suffered by children growing up around homosexual behavior.

·        Nor would they talk about the ex-gay movement (proof that homosexuality is not inborn)

·        [See 29 ex-‘gay’ testimonies at: www.SuchWereSomeOfYou.org ]

·        and the changes that come with healing.


 

Instead our side came up with only soft arguments like:

 

·        "every child needs a father and a mother,"

·        “marriage is about procreation,”

·        the need to respect “the long history of traditional marriage,”

·        and similar blather.

·        In fact, many lawyers on our side accepted civil unions as a reasonable alternative

·        and had no argument against homosexual "parenting"

·        — which made their "mother and father" argument impossible to defend.


#####

(Back to Homepage)